Navigating the Labyrinth: Understanding and Mastering the B2B Buyer Journey in 2025/2026

1. Executive Summary

The landscape of Business-to-Business (B2B) purchasing has undergone a seismic transformation, rendering traditional sales funnels and go-to-market (GTM) strategies increasingly obsolete. Today’s B2B buyer journey is characterized by its non-linear nature, extensive buyer control, digital dominance, and a significant degree of anonymity, particularly in the early stages. Buyers, empowered by readily available information and digital tools, conduct the majority of their research independently, often making critical decisions before ever engaging with a sales representative.1 This journey unfolds within a complex “Messy Middle,” an iterative cycle of exploration and evaluation heavily influenced by cognitive biases, peer recommendations, and the intricate dynamics of expanding buying committees.

Key trends shaping the B2B landscape for 2025/2026 include the pervasive integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in both buying and selling processes, the demand for hyper-personalized, seamless omnichannel experiences across numerous touchpoints, the growing influence of external experts and online communities, and the persistent challenge of buyer indecision and purchase regret.5 Success in this new era necessitates a fundamental paradigm shift away from seller-centric processes towards comprehensive buyer enablement. Businesses must prioritize building trust within a complex digital ecosystem, leveraging data-driven insights for deep personalization, delivering strategic, value-focused content, fostering agile alignment between marketing and sales, and adapting engagement strategies for diverse personas across Small-to-Medium Enterprises (SMEs) and large enterprises. The critical strategic imperatives involve embracing digital transformation wholeheartedly, understanding the nuances of buyer psychology, mastering account-centric orchestration, and cultivating resilience in GTM strategies to navigate the inherent complexities of the modern B2B market.

2. Introduction: The New Era of B2B Buying

The confluence of several powerful forces is fundamentally reshaping the way businesses purchase goods and services. Accelerated digital transformation, spurred further by global events, has placed a wealth of information and sophisticated tools directly into the hands of buyers. Simultaneously, a generational shift is occurring, with digitally native Millennials and Gen Z assuming key decision-making roles, bringing with them expectations shaped by seamless consumer experiences. This information abundance empowers buyers, fostering unprecedented independence and, often, a healthy skepticism towards traditional, sales-led approaches.1 Buyers now prefer to navigate much of their journey autonomously, conducting extensive research online before engaging vendors.

Compounding this complexity is the expansion of the B2B decision-making unit. Purchases increasingly involve larger, more diverse buying committees, with individuals representing multiple departments and priorities, making consensus-building a significant challenge.2 The core challenge for businesses today is clear: GTM strategies must evolve dramatically to meet buyers where they are – operating within a non-linear, digitally saturated, and often anonymous research environment. This report delves into the intricacies of this new B2B buying era, exploring its historical roots, adapting concepts like the “Messy Middle” from consumer behavior, analyzing the impact of social influence and the attention economy, and ultimately providing actionable strategies to navigate this complex landscape effectively in 2025/2026.

3. Tracing the Arc: From Traditional Funnels to Modern Complexity

Understanding the current state of B2B buying requires appreciating the historical evolution of the models used to describe it. Academic and practitioner understanding has progressed significantly from simple, linear conceptualizations to frameworks acknowledging intricate relationships, networks, and digitally mediated journeys.

Early Transactional and Situational Models (1950s-1970s): The earliest attempts to model B2B buying often viewed it through an economic lens, focusing on the transaction itself. Foundational work by Cyert, Simon, and Trow (1956) began to challenge purely rational economic assumptions by highlighting “non-programmed decisions” made under ambiguity, a common feature of B2B purchasing. Webster Jr. (1965) offered the first formal marketing model, outlining a four-step process: problem recognition, assignment of responsibility, search procedures, and choice procedures. A significant advancement came with the BuyGrid model (Robinson et al., 1967), which introduced contingency. It proposed eight “BuyPhases” (from problem anticipation to performance feedback) and three “BuyClasses” (new task, modified rebuy, straight rebuy), recognizing that the buying process varied depending on the novelty and complexity of the purchase situation. These early models provided essential structure but largely depicted a seller-influenced or internally procedural flow.

Influence and Response Models (1970s-1980s): The focus then broadened to encompass the multitude of factors influencing the decision. Webster Jr. and Wind (1972) developed a comprehensive model incorporating task (economic) and non-task (individual, social, organizational, environmental) variables, urging an integrated view. Sheth (1973) drew heavily on behavioral science, incorporating individual characteristics, conflict, risk, and information sources into the buying process. Concurrently, models began considering the supplier’s perspective and how marketing efforts could shape the buyer’s response. Choffray and Lilien (1978) created an operational model predicting customer response probability based on awareness, acceptance, individual evaluation, and group decision submodels. These models acknowledged greater complexity but often maintained a relatively linear progression.

Relationship and Network Models (1980s-1990s): A paradigm shift occurred with the recognition that B2B buying frequently happens within the context of ongoing relationships, not isolated transactions. Håkansson’s Interaction Model (1982) centered on the supplier-customer dyad, emphasizing that transactions are episodes within continuing relationships where both parties actively interact. Dwyer et al. (1987) proposed a five-phase relationship evolution model (awareness, exploration, expansion, commitment, dissolution), introducing concepts like mutual dependence and collaboration. The scope expanded further with network models, such as the Actors, Resources, and Activities (ARA) model (Axelsson & Easton, 1992), which highlighted the interconnectedness of multiple relationships influencing any single dyadic interaction. This era marked a move towards understanding the ecosystem surrounding the purchase.

Modern Journey and Digital Models (2010s-Present): Contemporary thinking, heavily influenced by digital technology, focuses on the customer’s holistic experience across all touchpoints. Models like McKinsey’s Customer Journey (Edelman & Singer, 2015) advocate for proactively managing the journey through digital means, personalization, and contextual interaction. Google’s Zero Moment of Truth (ZMOT) emphasized the critical online research phase preceding traditional decision points.

These historical models, while valuable, stand in stark contrast to the current B2B reality. The journey is no longer a predictable funnel controlled by marketing and sales. Instead, it is overwhelmingly buyer-led, non-linear, and digitally driven. Buyers now complete a vast majority of their research – estimates range from 69% to as high as 95% – independently and often anonymously online before ever engaging with a sales representative. This fundamental shift necessitates new frameworks for understanding and influencing the modern B2B buyer.

The progression from simple transactional views to intricate network and journey models directly reflects the increasing complexity, information availability, and buyer empowerment within the B2B environment itself. While these historical frameworks may seem outdated in their entirety, their core concepts are not entirely irrelevant. Elements like the BuyClasses (new task, modified rebuy, straight rebuy) identified in the BuyGrid model still offer valuable context for understanding how purchase complexity influences buyer behavior and information needs. However, these concepts now function as components or potential paths within a much larger, more fluid, and fundamentally buyer-controlled system, rather than defining the overarching structure of the journey. They inform personalization efforts but do not dictate the journey’s flow.

Table 1: Evolution of B2B Buying Models

Era Key Models/Concepts Core Focus Implied Buyer Journey Characteristic
1950s-1970s Cyert et al. (1956), Webster Jr. (1965), BuyGrid (1967) Transactions, Economic Rationality (Challenged), Process Steps, Situations Linear, Procedural, Situation-Dependent
1970s-1980s Webster & Wind (1972), Sheth (1973), Choffray & Lilien (1978) Influencing Factors (Task/Non-Task, Behavioral), Supplier Response Influenced, Moderately Complex
1980s-1990s Interaction Model (1982), Dwyer et al. (1987), ARA Model (1992) Dyadic Relationships, Relationship Phases, Networks, Interconnectedness Relational, Networked, Long-Term
2010s-Present McKinsey Journey (2015), ZMOT, Digital Touchpoints Customer Experience, Digital Channels, Proactive Journey Management Experience-Driven, Digitally-Mediated
Current Reality (2024+) (Synthesized View – see Section 9) Buyer Control, Non-Linearity, Anonymity, Committee Complexity, Messy Middle Buyer-Led, Non-Linear, Digital-First, Complex, Iterative

Source: Synthesized from 19 and analysis of current trends.

4. Adapting the “Messy Middle”: Understanding B2B Exploration and Evaluation

To better grasp the complexities of the modern B2B journey, it is instructive to borrow and adapt concepts from consumer behavior research, particularly Google’s “Messy Middle” framework.

Defining the “Messy Middle”: Developed through extensive research by Google and The Behavioural Architects, the “Messy Middle” describes the complex, non-linear space consumers navigate between an initial purchase trigger and the final buying decision. This space is characterized by iterative loops between two distinct mental modes: Exploration, an expansive activity where consumers gather information and add options to their consideration set, and Evaluation, a reductive activity where they weigh options, compare features, and narrow down choices. This entire process occurs against a backdrop of Exposure, encompassing all pre-existing brand perceptions and associations derived from past experiences, advertising, and word-of-mouth.

The Role of Cognitive Biases: Consumer navigation through this messy middle is heavily influenced by cognitive biases – mental shortcuts hardwired into human psychology. Google’s research highlighted six particularly potent biases in online purchasing:

  1. Category Heuristics: Simplified rules-of-thumb based on key product specifications (e.g., megapixels for cameras).
  2. Power of Now: Preference for immediate availability or gratification.
  3. Social Proof: Reliance on recommendations, reviews, and the actions of others.
  4. Scarcity Bias: Increased desirability of products perceived as limited in availability.
  5. Authority Bias: Tendency to trust experts or authoritative sources.
  6. Power of Free: Strong attraction to offers including a free item or service. These biases can significantly sway consumer preference, even allowing relatively unknown brands to gain traction against established players if leveraged effectively.

Applying the “Messy Middle” to B2B: While originating in consumer research, the “Messy Middle” concept provides a valuable lens for understanding B2B buying, albeit with necessary adaptations. The B2B journey is arguably inherently messier and more complex than its B2C counterpart. Factors contributing to this increased complexity include significantly longer decision cycles, larger financial investments, higher perceived risks associated with making the wrong choice, and the critical involvement of multiple stakeholders within formal or informal buying committees.

B2B Exploration and Evaluation: In the B2B context, the Exploration phase involves extensive research into potential solutions and vendors. Buyers utilize vendor websites, download white papers and industry reports, consult analyst research, participate in webinars, and increasingly, seek insights from social media platforms, online communities, and industry forums. A defining characteristic of this phase is its significant anonymity; buyers gather vast amounts of information before signaling intent to vendors. The Evaluation phase involves comparing shortlisted vendors based on features, capabilities, integration potential, pricing, and crucially, potential ROI.10 Buyers scrutinize case studies, seek peer reviews and testimonials, engage with interactive tools like ROI calculators, and may request demos or proofs of concept.

B2B Manifestations of Cognitive Biases: Cognitive biases also shape B2B decisions, though their manifestations differ:

B2B Manifestations of Cognitive Biase

  • Social Proof: This bias is exceptionally potent in B2B. Case studies demonstrating success in similar organizations, credible customer testimonials, peer reviews on platforms like G2 or TrustRadius, discussions in industry forums, and endorsements within professional networks heavily influence decisions.
  • Authority Bias: B2B buyers often defer to the perceived authority of industry analysts (e.g., Gartner, Forrester), respected thought leaders, and the established reputation and market share of vendors.
  • Category Heuristics: Buyers may use specific technical standards, integration capabilities (e.g., compatibility with existing CRM/ERP), compliance certifications, or key features as shortcuts to filter options.
  • Scarcity / Power of Now: While less about limited product stock, these biases can manifest as urgency around limited-time promotional pricing, faster implementation timelines, quicker demonstrated time-to-value, or early access programs.
  • Power of Free: The appeal of freemium software tiers, comprehensive free trials, valuable ungated research reports, or free assessment tools can significantly influence initial consideration and engagement.

The inherent risk aversion in B2B purchasing likely prolongs and intensifies the journey through the messy middle. B2B decisions carry significant financial and operational weight, and often, personal career implications for the individuals involved. This high-stakes environment amplifies the uncertainty inherent in the exploration and evaluation phases. Consequently, a primary function for buyers navigating this space is risk mitigation. This implies that B2B marketing and sales efforts must go beyond simply highlighting features and benefits. A critical objective must be to actively build buyer confidence and reduce perceived risk throughout the iterative loops of exploration and evaluation. This requires a strategic focus on leveraging trust signals like robust social proof and credible authority endorsements, providing transparent information, clearly articulating and quantifying the potential ROI, and equipping internal champions with the resources they need to justify the decision internally.

Table 2: Comparing Traditional B2B Funnels vs. B2B “Messy Middle” Journey

Feature Traditional B2B Funnel B2B “Messy Middle” Journey
Process Flow Linear, Sequential Stages (Awareness > Interest > etc.) Non-Linear, Iterative Loops (Exploration & Evaluation)
Buyer Control Primarily Seller/Marketer-Driven Primarily Buyer-Driven, Self-Directed Research
Information Flow Controlled by Vendor (Marketing/Sales Content) Abundant, Multi-Source (Vendor, Peers, Analysts, Communities)
Key Activities Lead Generation, Qualification, Pitching, Closing Independent Research, Solution Exploration, Option Evaluation, Consensus Building, Risk Mitigation
Sales Engagement Early and Continuous Often Late (Post-Significant Research), Strategic/Consultative
Anonymity Limited (Goal is early identification) High (Significant anonymous research phase)
Influences Sales Persuasion, Marketing Messages Cognitive Biases, Social Proof, Authority, Peer Influence, Content Value, Internal Politics
Decision Unit Often focuses on primary contact/decision-maker Explicit focus on complex Buying Committee dynamics
Metaphor Funnel (Filtering down) Labyrinth, Web, Loop (Complex navigation)
Primary Goal Move leads through predefined stages Enable buyers to confidently navigate complexity and make a decision

Source: Synthesized from Google’s Messy Middle concept 3 and analysis of B2B trends.

5. The 2025/2026 B2B Buyer Landscape: Dominant Trends and Behaviors

Synthesizing recent research from leading analyst firms and industry reports reveals a clear picture of the dominant trends and buyer behaviors expected to define the B2B landscape in 2025/2026.

  • Pervasive Digital Dominance: The shift to digital channels is not merely a trend but the prevailing reality. Gartner predicts that by 2025, a staggering 80% of B2B sales interactions between suppliers and buyers will occur via digital channels. E-commerce has already surpassed in-person sales as the most effective channel for many B2B organizations, driving significant revenue. This extends even to high-value transactions, with nearly 40% of buyers comfortable spending over $500,000 per order through self-service or remote interactions, and 73% willing to spend $50,000+ online. Forrester anticipates that by 2025, over half of large B2B transactions ($1M+) will be processed through digital self-serve channels.
  • Heightened Buyer Independence and Anonymity: Buyers are firmly in control of their journey. An overwhelming majority (75%) prefer a rep-free sales experience, relying on their own research. This self-directed research phase is extensive and largely invisible to vendors, with estimates suggesting 83% to 95% of the journey happens anonymously before any direct contact is made.2 Buyers often form strong preferences or even make decisions before engaging a salesperson.
  • Omnichannel Expectations: Buyers don’t just use digital channels; they expect a seamless, integrated experience across a multitude of them. McKinsey research indicates buyers now interact with ten or more channels throughout their journey, a significant increase from previous years. They expect consistency across departments and touchpoints, whether online, remote, or via self-service. While digital self-service is preferred for familiar purchases, a hybrid approach combining digital tools with human interaction proves most effective for complex deals, leading to higher-quality outcomes.
  • The Personalization Imperative: Generic messaging is no longer sufficient. A vast majority of B2B buyers (71%) expect personalized interactions tailored to their specific needs and context. They expect companies to adapt experiences based on their evolving requirements. AI is becoming a key enabler for delivering this personalization at scale, with studies showing significant ROI improvements for companies investing in it.
  • Accelerated AI Integration: AI is rapidly permeating both sides of the B2B transaction. Buyers increasingly leverage generative AI tools like ChatGPT for research and information gathering. Simultaneously, sales and marketing teams are adopting AI for tasks like lead scoring, forecasting, content creation, personalization, and identifying next-best actions. However, this adoption comes with expectations of transparency and ethical use from buyers.
  • Shifting Influence Ecosystem: Decision-making is increasingly influenced by sources beyond the vendor and the internal buying committee. External influencers, industry peers, online communities, and social media platforms play a growing role in shaping perceptions and guiding choices. Forrester predicts over 50% of younger buyers will rely on such external sources in 2025. Advice from trusted connections remains highly influential.
  • Expanding Buying Committee Complexity: B2B buying groups continue to grow in size and diversity. Averages range from 10 to 13 core members, but the total number of individuals influencing a deal can exceed 20. These committees involve multiple departments (89% involve two or more), adding layers of complexity and lengthening sales cycles. Furthermore, Millennials and Gen Z now constitute a significant portion of these committees, bringing their digital-native expectations.
  • Evolving Data and Measurement Strategies: The focus is shifting from traditional lead-centric metrics like MQLs (which are proving less reliable) towards account-centric analysis that tracks the engagement and progression of the entire buying group. The deprecation of third-party cookies necessitates a stronger reliance on building and leveraging robust first-party data strategies. Demonstrating clear ROI remains paramount.
  • Persistent Purchase Regret and Indecision: Despite increased information access, B2B buyers struggle with decision confidence. Gartner reports high levels of purchase regret, even before contracts are signed. Forrester notes that a significant majority of B2B purchases stall during the buying process, and many buyers express dissatisfaction with their chosen providers post-purchase. This highlights a critical gap in buyer enablement and confidence-building.

A notable tension exists within these trends. Buyers express a strong preference for rep-free, independent digital experiences, yet research also indicates that purely self-service digital purchases are more likely to result in subsequent regret. This apparent contradiction suggests that while buyers value autonomy and wish to avoid traditional sales pressure, they simultaneously struggle with the inherent complexity and risk of significant B2B decisions when left entirely to their own devices. The opportunity for vendors lies not simply in providing self-service tools, but in designing guided digital experiences. This involves offering interactive comparison tools, ROI calculators, contextual help, AI-powered assistants, and readily accessible, high-quality educational content. It also means repositioning human sales interactions. Instead of pushing a sale early on, salespeople should be available on the buyer’s terms as strategic advisors, ready to step in during the later, more complex stages of validation, customization, and consensus-building within the buying committee. The objective shifts from controlling the sale to empowering the buyer with the right blend of independent resources and optional, high-value human guidance.

Table 3: Key B2B Buyer Trends for 2025/2026

Trend Category Key Statistics & Predictions Core Implication for Businesses Supporting Research
Digital Dominance 80% of interactions digital by 2025; E-commerce top revenue channel; >50% of $1M+ deals via digital self-serve. Must have robust, seamless digital channels & e-commerce capabilities. 6
Buyer Independence & Anonymity 75% prefer rep-free; 83-95% of journey anonymous; Decisions often made before contact. Must influence buyers during anonymous research via content & digital presence. 1
Omnichannel Expectations Buyers use 10+ channels; Expect seamless, consistent experience across all touchpoints. Requires integrated, orchestrated GTM strategy across all relevant channels. 12
Personalization Imperative 71% expect personalized interactions; Expect adaptation to changing needs. Requires deep buyer understanding & technology (AI) to deliver personalization at scale. 7
AI Integration Buyers use GenAI for research; Sellers use AI for efficiency, insights, content. Need to strategically adopt AI in GTM while ensuring trust & transparency. 8
Influence Shifts Growing reliance on external influencers, peers, online communities, social media. Must engage beyond direct buyers; build presence in relevant communities & influencer networks. 6
Buying Committee Complexity Avg. 10-13+ members (20+ influencers); More departments involved; Millennial/Gen Z dominance. Requires account-based strategies, multi-threaded engagement, consensus-building focus. 4
Data & Measurement Shifts Move from MQLs to account-level metrics; Need for 1st-party data; Focus on ROI. Requires investment in data infrastructure, analytics, and revised measurement frameworks. 2
Purchase Regret & Indecision High rates of purchase regret & stalled deals. Critical need to build buyer confidence, provide clear value, and enable decision-making. 4

Source: Synthesized from multiple research snippets as cited.

6. Decoding the Decision Unit: The Modern B2B Buying Committee

Navigating the modern B2B buyer journey requires a deep understanding of the increasingly complex entity at its heart: the buying committee. Gone are the days of targeting a single decision-maker; today’s significant B2B purchases are overwhelmingly group decisions.

Growing Size and Complexity: Research consistently points to the expanding size of these committees. Averages often cited range from 6-10 or 10-13 core members, with some studies indicating a 28% increase in size over just two years. The total number of individuals exerting influence on a purchase, directly or indirectly, can reach 20 or more. This expansion isn’t just numerical; it’s also cross-functional. Forrester notes that 89% of purchases involve two or more departments, and McKinsey highlights the delays (20-30% longer cycles) caused by multi-departmental involvement in large companies. This inherent complexity significantly slows down the decision-making process and makes achieving alignment a primary challenge. External advisors, such as consultants or analysts, are also increasingly involved in nearly three-quarters of buying teams, further extending cycles and adding another layer of influence.

Diverse Roles and Priorities: Within the committee, individuals play distinct roles, each bringing their own perspectives, priorities, and success metrics.

B2B buyer journey - Diverse Roles and Priorities

Common roles include:

  • Initiators: Recognize the initial need or problem.
  • Users: The individuals who will ultimately use the product/service daily (prioritize usability, features directly impacting their work).
  • Influencers: Provide technical expertise, recommendations, or define specifications (often IT, subject matter experts).
  • Buyers/Procurement: Manage the purchasing process, vendor negotiations, and contractual terms (focus on price, terms, vendor reliability).
  • Deciders: Hold the formal authority to make the final decision (often senior executives, budget holders).
  • Gatekeepers: Control the flow of information to the committee (e.g., executive assistants, procurement).
  • Financial Scrutinizers: Analyze the cost-effectiveness, ROI, and budget implications (typically Finance department members).
  • Champions: Internal advocates who believe in the solution and work to build consensus and push the deal forward.

These diverse roles inevitably lead to competing agendas and priorities. IT personnel focus on technical compatibility, security, and integration, while the Finance department scrutinizes cost-effectiveness and ROI. End-users prioritize ease of use and practical benefits. Reconciling these varied viewpoints is a major hurdle.

Challenges in Committee Dynamics: Engaging effectively with buying committees requires navigating several inherent challenges

B2B Buyer Journey - Challenges in Committee Dynamics

  • Achieving Consensus: Gaining agreement among members with different goals and perspectives is often the most significant obstacle.
  • Internal Politics & Power Dynamics: Understanding the informal influence structures and relationships within the committee is crucial but difficult.
  • Resistance to Change: Overcoming inertia and objections related to cost, complexity, disruption, or perceived risk is common.
  • Budget Constraints & Financial Scrutiny: High-value purchases face intense financial review, demanding clear ROI justification and alignment with strategic financial goals.
  • Information Overload & Analysis Paralysis: The sheer volume of information and options can overwhelm the committee, leading to indecision.
  • Fear of Making the Wrong Choice: The high stakes involved can lead to risk-averse behavior and prolonged evaluation cycles.

The Champion’s Crucial Role: In this complex environment, identifying and empowering an internal champion is often critical for success. The champion acts as an internal guide, helping to navigate organizational politics, articulate the solution’s value in terms relevant to different stakeholders, and build the necessary consensus to move the decision forward. Providing the champion with easily shareable resources, data-driven arguments, and tailored messaging is a key enablement tactic.

Implications for Marketing and Sales: The reality of the complex buying committee mandates a shift away from individual lead-focused strategies towards account-based approaches (ABM/ABX). Success requires identifying all relevant committee members, understanding their individual roles and motivations, engaging them with targeted content and messaging (multi-threaded engagement), tracking account-level signals, and deploying sales strategies focused on facilitating consensus and addressing diverse stakeholder needs.

The growing size and functional diversity within these committees mean that a monolithic value proposition or a single piece of content will rarely suffice. Different roles require different information presented in different ways. For instance, a CFO needs a clear ROI analysis, while an end-user needs to understand usability benefits , and IT needs technical specifications. This necessitates a more modular and multi-faceted content strategy. Instead of isolated assets, businesses need to develop interconnected “content portfolios” designed for specific accounts. These portfolios should contain tailored assets addressing the unique questions, concerns, formats, and metrics relevant to each key role within that account’s buying committee. Furthermore, recognizing the champion’s role in internal selling , this content must be easily digestible, shareable, and synthesizable to equip them effectively for building internal alignment and driving the decision forward.

Table 4: B2B Buying Committee Roles & Considerations

Role Description Typical Priorities & Concerns Engagement Considerations
Initiator Identifies the need/problem. Problem definition, potential impact. Provide educational content defining the problem space.
User Will use the product/service daily. Ease of use, functionality, impact on workflow, training/support. Offer hands-on demos, user testimonials, focus on practical benefits.
Influencer (Technical) Provides expertise (e.g., IT, Engineer). Technical specs, compatibility, integration, security, reliability. Provide detailed technical documentation, address compatibility concerns.
Influencer (Business) Advises based on business impact (e.g., Consultant). Strategic alignment, market trends, best practices, potential risks. Share thought leadership, industry reports, address strategic implications.
Buyer (Procurement) Manages purchasing process, negotiates terms. Price, contract terms, vendor viability, compliance, process efficiency. Provide clear pricing, favourable terms, demonstrate reliability.
Decider Holds final approval authority (e.g., CEO, VP). Strategic fit, overall business value, ROI, risk mitigation, long-term partnership. Focus on high-level value proposition, ROI, strategic impact, build trust.
Financial Scrutinizer (CFO/Finance) Evaluates financial viability. Cost-effectiveness, ROI, budget alignment, payment terms, financial risk. Provide detailed ROI calculators, financial projections, flexible payment options.
Gatekeeper Controls information flow. Relevance, adherence to process. Provide concise summaries, respect communication protocols.
Champion Advocates internally for the solution. Believes in the solution’s value, navigating internal politics, building consensus. Equip with tailored content, data, and arguments to influence others; make it easy for them to share.

Source: Synthesized from.

7. Persona Focus: Contrasting SME and Enterprise Buyer Journeys

While overarching trends impact all B2B buyers, significant differences exist between the journeys, motivations, and constraints of buyers within Small-to-Medium Enterprises (SMEs) versus those in large enterprises. Tailoring strategies requires understanding these distinct personas.

SME Buyers:

  • Characteristics: SME buyers often operate under significant resource constraints, including limited budgets, smaller teams, and less available time. They may lack deep in-house expertise in specific areas, requiring solutions that are easier to implement and manage. Buying groups tend to be smaller, though individuals often wear multiple hats, combining operational, financial, and decision-making responsibilities. While decision-making can potentially be faster once a need is clearly defined and budget approved, the initial justification phase can be a significant hurdle due to financial constraints.
  • Motivations and Needs: The primary drivers for SME purchases often revolve around immediate problem-solving, operational efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. They seek solutions that offer a quick time-to-value, are reliable, easy to use, and don’t demand extensive internal resources for ongoing management. Strong vendor support and partnership are often highly valued, as SMEs may rely on vendors for guidance and expertise they lack internally. Flexibility and scalability are also key considerations, allowing solutions to grow with the business.
  • Information Sources: SMEs heavily rely on online research, vendor websites, and peer recommendations. Reviews and discussions within SME-focused online communities or industry forums can be particularly influential. They respond well to straightforward case studies and testimonials featuring similar-sized businesses demonstrating tangible results. Due to expertise gaps, they might also engage fractional consultants or advisors.
  • Journey Nuances: SMEs often prefer self-service options for simpler, lower-cost solutions but require easily accessible and responsive support when needed. Their journey might be less formalized than in enterprises. Given their resource constraints and potential lack of deep prior knowledge, marketing plays a crucial role in educating and nurturing SME buyers much deeper into the consideration and evaluation phases, effectively bridging gaps traditionally handled by sales.

Enterprise Buyers:

  • Characteristics: Enterprise buyers navigate complex, often bureaucratic organizational structures. They are part of larger, more formalized buying committees involving numerous stakeholders from various specialized departments (e.g., IT, security, finance, legal, procurement). Decisions involve significantly larger financial investments, complex integration challenges with existing enterprise systems, and rigorous internal scrutiny regarding security, compliance, and risk. Dedicated procurement teams often manage the formal purchasing process.
  • Motivations and Needs: Enterprise decisions are driven by strategic objectives, demonstrable ROI, scalability to support large operations, robust security protocols, compliance with regulations, and seamless integration capabilities. Long-term vendor viability and the potential for a strategic partnership are critical considerations. They seek solutions addressing complex, often organization-wide challenges and require thorough risk mitigation strategies.
  • Information Sources: Enterprise buyers place significant weight on formal research and validation. They rely heavily on reports from major industry analyst firms (like Gartner and Forrester), detailed technical whitepapers, comprehensive vendor documentation, and peer references from other comparable large organizations. Consultants and external advisors frequently play a role in the evaluation process. Formal product demonstrations and structured proofs of concept (POCs) or proofs of value (POVs) are often mandatory steps.
  • Journey Nuances: The enterprise buying journey is characterized by significantly longer and more complex sales cycles. Extensive internal consensus-building across multiple departments and hierarchical levels is required. Content must be highly tailored to address the specific needs and technical depth required by diverse, specialized roles within the large committee. Vendor expertise, responsiveness, and the ability to act as a strategic partner are highly valued. While digital self-service is used for research, sales representatives often play a more involved and crucial role in navigating organizational complexity, facilitating stakeholder alignment, customizing solutions, and guiding the deal through intricate internal processes.

While both SME and enterprise buyers embrace digital channels for research, their preferred digital ecosystems and information sources often diverge. Enterprise buyers might gravitate towards formal analyst reports, established vendor resources, and large industry conferences. SME buyers, conversely, might be more active and influenced by discussions within niche online communities, industry-specific forums, LinkedIn groups, or even relevant subreddits where they can connect directly with peers facing similar challenges. This distinction highlights that an effective omnichannel strategy requires more than just broad channel presence. It demands careful prioritization and tailoring of engagement based on where specific target personas – differentiating not only between SME and enterprise but also among the various roles within their respective buying committees – genuinely seek information, interact with peers, and build trust.  A one-size-fits-all digital approach will fail to resonate effectively across these distinct segments.

Table 5: Key Differences: SME vs. Enterprise B2B Buyer Personas

Feature SME Buyer Persona Enterprise Buyer Persona
Resource Constraints High (Budget, Time, Personnel) Lower (but subject to internal allocation/politics)
Internal Expertise Often Generalist / Limited Often Specialized / Deep
Buying Committee Smaller, Individuals wear multiple hats Larger, Formalized, Cross-Functional, Specialized Roles
Decision Speed Potentially Faster (post-justification) Slower, More Process-Driven
Primary Motivations Cost-Efficiency, Ease of Use, Quick ROI, Problem Solving, Reliability Strategic Alignment, Scalability, Security, Integration, Compliance, Long-Term Value, Risk Mitigation
Risk Tolerance Moderate (Budget sensitive) Lower (High impact of failure)
Key Information Sources Online Research, Peer Reviews (SME focus), Vendor Sites, Communities/Forums Analyst Reports, Whitepapers, Enterprise Peer References, Consultants, Formal Demos/POCs
Vendor Relationship Values Support, Partnership, Guidance Values Strategic Partnership, Expertise, Viability
Sales Cycle Shorter to Moderate Longer, More Complex
Marketing Role Educate Deeply, Nurture, Build Trust Provide Deep Content, Enable Consensus, Demonstrate Strategic Value
Sales Role Consultative Support, Build Relationship Strategic Consultation, Navigate Complexity, Facilitate Consensus

Source: Synthesized from.

8. Digital Ecosystem Influence: Content, Social Media, and the Attention Economy

The modern B2B buyer operates within a rich digital ecosystem where various elements converge to shape their journey through the exploration and evaluation phases. Understanding the influence of content, social platforms, peer networks, and the dynamics of attention is crucial for effective engagement.

Content Marketing as the Cornerstone: In a buyer-led environment where individuals conduct extensive self-research, content marketing assumes a pivotal role. It’s no longer just about attracting attention but about educating, building trust, and guiding buyers through their complex decision-making process. Different content formats serve distinct purposes across the journey:

  • Awareness Stage: Blog posts, industry reports, research findings, and thought leadership articles help buyers define their problems and establish the vendor as a knowledgeable resource.
  • Consideration Stage: Webinars, detailed case studies, product comparison guides, whitepapers, and ROI calculators provide deeper insights into solutions and help buyers evaluate options.
  • Decision Stage: Product demos, customer testimonials, implementation guides, and free trials offer validation and address final concerns before purchase. A significant shift is occurring towards providing high-value, educational content without requiring registration (ungated content) to influence buyers during their anonymous research phase. Furthermore, personalization is key; tailoring content to specific industry challenges, roles within the buying committee, or stage in the journey significantly increases relevance and impact. Content must also demonstrate Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness (E-E-A-T) to resonate with discerning buyers and align with search engine quality criteria.

Social Media and Peer Influence: The influence of social media and peer networks in B2B purchasing is undeniable and growing. Platforms like LinkedIn are primary channels for professional networking, information discovery, and discussion. Beyond mainstream platforms, niche online communities, industry-specific forums, and platforms like Reddit host valuable conversations where buyers seek advice, share experiences, and evaluate potential solutions. Peer recommendations and reviews, whether shared directly or aggregated on sites like G2 and TrustRadius, carry immense weight, acting as powerful social proof. Research indicates advice from friends and peers is often the most influential information source. Businesses can leverage this by actively monitoring relevant platforms (social listening) and engaging authentically within these communities – not by overtly selling, but by providing genuine help, answering questions, and sharing expertise.

The Attention Economy and ‘Trading Attention’: In a world saturated with information, capturing and holding buyer attention is a major challenge. Gary Vaynerchuk’s concept of “Day Trading Attention” offers a relevant perspective. It advocates for identifying where target audiences are currently focusing their attention – particularly platforms or contexts where attention is currently “underpriced” (i.e., high engagement potential relative to cost or effort) – and then creating relevant, native content to engage them in those specific spaces. Applied to B2B, this means looking beyond broad marketing campaigns to find the specific LinkedIn groups, niche industry forums, subreddits, online events, or even specific thought leaders that command the attention of target buyer personas. The emphasis is on continuous monitoring of where attention flows and agility in creating content tailored to the nuances and culture of each platform. This approach prioritizes building brand presence and long-term relationships within relevant communities by consistently providing value and participating authentically, rather than focusing solely on short-term, transactional conversions.

The sheer volume of content available today means buyers are often overwhelmed. In this context, simply producing more content risks adding to the noise. Applying the principle of “Day Trading Attention” effectively in the 2025/2026 B2B landscape shifts the focus from quantity to hyper-relevance and contextual timing. Success lies in cutting through the clutter by delivering precisely the right insight or piece of information at the specific moment a buyer needs it during their exploration or evaluation loop. This requires sophisticated understanding of buyer intent, often gleaned through intent data platforms and AI-driven analysis. It’s about being the most helpful and relevant resource within the specific digital space – be it a search query, a forum discussion, or a social media feed – where the buyer’s attention is currently focused. Delivering this targeted value precisely when and where it’s needed becomes the most effective way to capture and capitalize on underpriced attention in an overloaded digital environment.

9. A Synthesized View: Frameworks for the 2025/2026 B2B Journey

The evidence overwhelmingly indicates that traditional linear funnel models are inadequate for representing the complexities of the modern B2B buyer journey. New frameworks are needed that incorporate buyer control, non-linearity, digital dominance, anonymity, committee dynamics, and the iterative nature of exploration and evaluation.

Rejecting the Linear Funnel: The first step is to explicitly move beyond the funnel metaphor. Its sequential, seller-driven assumptions fail to capture the reality of buyers jumping between stages, conducting parallel research streams, and engaging with multiple touchpoints in unpredictable orders.

The B2B “Messy Middle” Loop: A more accurate representation adapts Google’s “Messy Middle” concept to the B2B context. This framework visualizes the core journey as an iterative loop between Exploration (information gathering, identifying potential solutions/vendors) and Evaluation (comparing options, assessing fit, validating choices).

The B2B Messy Middle Loop

Key B2B adaptations include:

  • Multiple Stakeholder Loops: Recognizing that different members of the buying committee may be in different phases of the loop simultaneously, or may cycle through it multiple times based on their specific role and concerns.
  • Internal Dynamics: Incorporating the influence of internal discussions, politics, and consensus-building efforts that occur alongside external exploration and evaluation.
  • Risk Mitigation & Confidence Building: Highlighting these as central goals driving buyer behavior within the loop, influencing the types of information sought and the weight given to different factors (e.g., social proof, ROI).
  • Diverse Information Inputs: Showing how the loop is fed by a wide array of sources: vendor content, analyst reports, peer reviews, online community discussions, social media insights, consultant advice, and potentially, interactions with sales.
  • Anonymity Phase: Explicitly acknowledging the significant portion of the looping process that occurs before the buyer identifies themselves to vendors.

Account-Centric Journey Orchestration: Building on the B2B Messy Middle, an operational framework focused on Account-Centric Journey Orchestration provides a more strategic approach for GTM teams. This shifts the focus from managing individual leads to understanding and influencing the collective journey of the entire buying committee within a target account.

Account-Centric Journey Orchestration

Key elements include:

  • Account & Committee Mapping: Proactively identifying target accounts and the key individuals within their likely buying committees.
  • Multi-Persona Journey Tracking: Monitoring engagement signals and intent data at the account level to understand where different stakeholders are within their individual exploration/evaluation loops.
  • Orchestrated Multi-Threaded Engagement: Delivering tailored content, messaging, and interactions designed for specific roles and stages within the committee, coordinated across marketing and sales touchpoints.
  • Enablement Focus: Providing resources and tools (e.g., ROI calculators, shareable summaries) designed to help internal champions build consensus and navigate internal hurdles.
  • Account-Level Measurement: Tracking progress based on account-level engagement, committee member activation, progression through key consideration milestones, and ultimately, pipeline velocity and deal closure, rather than solely relying on lead volume or MQLs.

These synthesized frameworks emphasize several key dimensions that define the 2025/2026 B2B journey: Buyer Control, Non-Linearity, Digital Dominance, a significant Anonymity Phase, inherent Buying Committee Complexity, critical Persona Variations (SME vs. Enterprise), the need for Omnichannel Touchpoint consistency, diverse Influence Factors (Content, Peers, AI, Sales), and the overarching goal of Building Confidence and Facilitating Consensus.

Adopting such frameworks fundamentally reshapes the traditional roles of Marketing and Sales. Marketing’s responsibilities expand significantly beyond initial awareness generation. It becomes crucial for deeply influencing the anonymous exploration and evaluation phases through strategic content creation, digital presence management across relevant communities, and the generation of actionable account-level intelligence. Marketing essentially owns a larger portion of the mid-journey influence. Sales, often engaging later in the process, shifts from a primary focus on lead qualification and product pitching towards a more strategic, consultative role. Sales professionals become facilitators of complex evaluations, experts in navigating committee dynamics, builders of consensus among diverse stakeholders, and adept users of digital tools for hybrid engagement. This evolution necessitates deep integration between the two functions, breaking down traditional silos and aligning around shared account-based objectives, data, and metrics focused on delivering value and guiding the account (not just the lead) successfully through its complex journey.

10. Strategic Navigation: Actionable Recommendations for Businesses

Adapting to the transformed B2B buyer journey requires deliberate, strategic action across multiple facets of the go-to-market approach. Based on the analysis and insights from leading research firms, the following recommendations provide a roadmap for businesses aiming to thrive in 2025/2026:

  1. Revamp Content Strategy for Buyer Enablement:
  • Buyer-Centricity: Develop content that genuinely addresses buyer pain points, challenges, and questions at each stage, tailored to specific personas and committee roles.
  • Prioritize Value & Trust: Offer substantial educational content without mandatory registration (ungated) to build trust and influence anonymous research. Focus on demonstrating Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness (E-E-A-T).
  • Format Diversity: Utilize a mix of formats, including engaging short-form video, interactive tools (ROI calculators, configurators), webinars, detailed case studies, and easily digestible formats suitable for sharing internally by champions.
  1. Optimize Digital Presence and Embrace Omnichannel:
  • Website as a Hub: Ensure your website is a comprehensive resource hub, optimized for self-service research, easy navigation, and B2B-specific search behaviors (SEO).
  • Channel Consistency: Deliver a seamless and consistent brand experience across all relevant touchpoints (estimated 10+), including website, social media, email, chat, events, and sales interactions.
  • Community Engagement: Identify and participate authentically in relevant online communities and industry forums where target buyers seek information and peer advice. Focus on being helpful, not just promotional.
  • ‘Trade Attention’ Strategically: Apply “Day Trading Attention” principles: identify where specific personas spend time (especially underpriced channels), understand the context, and deliver relevant value natively on those platforms.
  1. Harness Data and Drive Hyper-Personalization:
  • First-Party Data Foundation: Invest in building a robust first-party data strategy to understand buyer behavior directly, compensating for the decline of third-party cookies.
  • Leverage Analytics & AI: Utilize advanced analytics and AI/machine learning to gain deep insights into buyer behavior, predict needs, identify intent signals, score accounts, and enable hyper-personalization of content and interactions at scale.
  • Account-Centric Measurement: Shift performance measurement from lead-based metrics (MQLs) to account-level engagement, buying committee activation, and journey progression indicators.
  • Privacy and Transparency: Ensure all data practices are transparent, ethical, and comply with privacy regulations, clearly communicating data usage to build trust.
  1. Integrate AI and Automation Thoughtfully:
  • Strategic Implementation: Deploy AI tools strategically across the GTM process: predictive lead/account scoring, next-best-action recommendations for sales, automated (but personalized) outreach, AI-powered content generation assistance, intelligent chatbots for initial qualification and support.
  • Human Augmentation: Position AI as a tool to augment human capabilities, freeing up teams for more strategic tasks, rather than a wholesale replacement, especially for complex relationship-building. Ensure human oversight and validation where necessary.
  • Team Enablement: Provide adequate training to ensure marketing and sales teams can effectively utilize AI tools and interpret their outputs.
  1. Evolve Sales Strategy and Enablement:
  • Consultative Role: Transition sales from pitching products to acting as strategic consultants who help buyers navigate complexity, define problems accurately (potentially challenging initial assumptions), and build internal consensus.
  • Hybrid Engagement: Equip sales teams with the digital skills and tools necessary for effective hybrid selling (combining digital and human touchpoints).
  • Value Selling Focus: Train sales teams to articulate and quantify value clearly, aligning solutions with specific buyer business outcomes and ROI expectations.
  • Marketing Alignment: Foster deep collaboration and alignment between marketing and sales, based on shared data, common goals (account-focused), and integrated processes.
  1. Master Buying Committee Engagement:
  • Thorough Mapping: Invest effort in identifying and mapping the key members of the buying committee within target accounts, understanding their roles, influence, and priorities.
  • Targeted Communication: Develop and deliver messaging, content, and engagement tactics tailored to the specific needs and perspectives of different committee roles.
  • Champion Enablement: Identify potential internal champions early and provide them with the specific information, tools (e.g., ROI calculators, comparison guides, internal presentation decks), and support they need to advocate effectively internally.
  1. Implement Persona-Specific Tactics:
  • SME Approach: Focus on clear value propositions, ease of use, strong support, cost-effectiveness, and building trust through relatable case studies and community engagement. Utilize marketing automation for deep nurturing.
  • Enterprise Approach: Emphasize strategic alignment, scalability, security, ROI, and integration capabilities. Leverage analyst relations, detailed technical content, and strategic sales consultation to navigate complex committees and long cycles.

Table 6: Actionable Strategies Mapped to B2B Journey Challenges

Challenge Actionable Strategy Supporting Research / Rationale
Buyer Anonymity / Self-Service Preference Develop high-value, ungated educational content; Optimize website for self-research; Engage in relevant online communities. 2
Non-Linear / “Messy Middle” Journey Adopt account-centric view; Use intent data & AI for personalization; Provide guided digital experiences; Position sales as strategic advisors for complex stages. 3
Buying Committee Complexity Map committee roles & priorities; Create role-specific content; Enable internal champions; Focus sales on consensus building. 4
Omnichannel Expectations Integrate marketing & sales tech stacks; Ensure consistent messaging across 10+ channels; Orchestrate cross-channel experiences. 12
Demand for Personalization Build robust 1st-party data strategy; Leverage AI for hyper-personalization at scale; Tailor content & interactions to persona/stage. 2
Information Overload / Need for Trust Focus content on E-E-A-T; Leverage social proof (case studies, reviews); Build authority via thought leadership; Apply ‘Trading Attention’ for relevance. 17
Purchase Regret / Lack of Confidence Focus on value selling & clear ROI; Provide robust social proof & validation; Offer transparency; Position sales to guide complex validation. 4
Rise of AI in Buying/Selling Integrate AI strategically in GTM; Ensure ethical & transparent use; Train teams on AI tools; Monitor AI impact on buyer behavior. 8
SME vs. Enterprise Differences Tailor content complexity, channel focus, sales approach, and support models based on target segment characteristics. 1

Source: Synthesized from analysis and recommendations across multiple research snippets.

11. Conclusion: Building a Resilient Go-to-Market Strategy

The B2B buyer journey of 2025/2026 bears little resemblance to the linear funnels of the past. It is a complex, dynamic, and often opaque process fundamentally characterized by buyer control, digital self-service, significant anonymity, the intricate dynamics of multi-stakeholder buying committees, and the expectation of deeply personalized, omnichannel engagement. Buyers navigate a “Messy Middle” of exploration and evaluation, influenced by a myriad of factors including cognitive biases, peer validation, expert opinions, and a deluge of digital content.

Adapting to this new reality is not optional; it is imperative for survival and growth. Success demands a profound shift in mindset and strategy, moving decisively away from seller-centric control towards comprehensive buyer enablement. This involves embracing agility, leveraging data intelligence through first-party sources and AI, building trust through transparency and value delivery, and fostering deep alignment between marketing, sales, and customer success teams. Understanding the nuances of the B2B “Messy Middle” – particularly the critical need to build confidence and mitigate perceived risk for increasingly independent yet often overwhelmed buyers – is paramount.

The path forward requires strategic investment in content that educates and empowers, digital platforms that facilitate seamless self-service and guided experiences, technologies that enable personalization and automation at scale, and sales approaches that prioritize consultation and consensus-building. By embracing these changes, investing wisely in the recommended strategies and technologies, and cultivating a culture of continuous learning and adaptation, business leaders can build resilient go-to-market strategies capable of not only navigating but thriving in the intricate labyrinth of the modern B2B buyer journey.

Works cited

  1. Scale Smarter, Not Harder: Adapting Your B2B Buyer Journey in …, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.demandgenreport.com/uncategorized/scale-smarter-not-harder-adapting-your-b2b-buyer-journey-in-2025/48793/
  2. Significant Shifts Are Happening in the B2B Buyer Journey | BOL …, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.bol-agency.com/blog/significant-shifts-are-happening-in-the-b2b-buyer-journey
  3. Navigating purchase behavior & decision-making – Think with Google, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/consumer-insights/consumer-journey/navigating-purchase-behavior-and-decision-making/
  4. Forrester: To Master B2B Buying Mayhem, Providers Must Prioritize Buyers’ Needs, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241204021888/en/Forrester-To-Master-B2B-Buying-Mayhem-Providers-Must-Prioritize-Buyers-Needs
  5. Top Tech Provider Trends for 2025: Insights from Gartner – Genius Drive, accessed April 21, 2025, https://geniusdrive.com/top-tech-provider-trends-for-2025-insights-from-gartner/
  6. Forrester Predictions 2025: B2B Marketing and Sales, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.forrester.com/press-newsroom/forrester-predictions-2025-b2b-marketing-sales/
  7. The three great B2B marketing trends of 2025 – Solocom, accessed April 21, 2025, https://solocom.ca/en/the-three-great-b2b-marketing-trends-2025/
  8. How ChatGPT search reshapes the B2B buyer’s journey | MarTech, accessed April 21, 2025, https://martech.org/how-chatgpt-search-reshapes-the-b2b-buyers-journey/
  9. Why 2025 Will Demand More Personalized Buyer Experiences – Madison Logic, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.madisonlogic.com/blog/more-personalized-buyer-experiences/
  10. How Content Shapes B2B Buyer Decisions in 2025 – Proofed, accessed April 21, 2025, https://proofed.com/knowledge-hub/how-content-shapes-b2b-buyer-decisions-in-2025/
  11. The Modern B2B Buyer’s Journey: Embracing Digital Transformation, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.orchid-agency.com/blog/modern-buyers
  12. Modern B2B Buyers and Buyer Journeys | Konica Minolta, accessed April 21, 2025, https://kmbs.konicaminolta.us/blog/modern-b2b-buyers-and-buyer-journeys/
  13. The changing shape of B2B demand generation – Pipeline360, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.pipeline-360.com/blog/b2b-changing-shape
  14. Understanding The Changing B2B Buyer Journey – Forbes, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesbusinesscouncil/2021/06/18/understanding-the-changing-b2b-buyer-journey/
  15. 4 Ways B2B Marketers Can Align With The New Sales Environment, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesagencycouncil/2024/01/08/4-strategies-b2b-marketers-can-use-to-align-with-the-new-sales-environment/
  16. The B2B Buying Journey: Key Stages and How to Optimize Them – Gartner, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.gartner.com/en/sales/insights/b2b-buying-journey
  17. Understanding Modern B2B Buyer Expectations and How to Adapt – BetterCommerce, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.bettercommerce.io/articles/understanding-and-adapting-to-modern-b2b-buyer-expectations
  18. Escalation of Commitment: The Hidden Bias That’s Killing Deals Before They Start, accessed April 21, 2025, https://corporatevisions.com/blog/escalation-of-commitment-in-sales/
  19. www.engagementb2b.com, accessed April 21, 2025, http://www.engagementb2b.com/uploads/8/0/1/0/80108680/in_press_imm.pdf
  20. www.thinkwithgoogle.com, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/_qs/documents/9998/Decoding_Decisions_The_Messy_Middle_of_Purchase_Behavior.pdf
  21. Mapping the B2B Buyer Journey – Big Village, accessed April 21, 2025, https://big-village.com/news/mapping-the-b2b-buyer-journey/
  22. Navigating the B2B Buyer Journey – Trends and Benchmarks in …, accessed April 21, 2025, https://trendemon.com/blog/navigating-the-b2b-buyer-journey-trends-and-benchmarks-in-2023/
  23. B2B Buying Behavior in 2025: 40 Stats and Five Hard Truths That Sales Can’t Ignore, accessed April 21, 2025, https://corporatevisions.com/blog/b2b-buying-behavior-statistics-trends/
  24. The B2B Buyer Journey: A Comprehensive Guide – OrangeOwl, accessed April 21, 2025, https://orangeowl.marketing/b2b-marketing/b2b-buyer-journey-2/
  25. New Google research: Decoding consumer decision-making, accessed April 21, 2025, https://business.google.com/us/think/consumer-insights/the-consumer-decision-making-process/
  26. DECODING DECISIONS: Why marketers need to master the messy middle – The Behavioural Architects, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.thebearchitects.com/our-work/blog/decoding-decisions-why-marketers-need-to-master-the-messy-middle/
  27. How marketers can make an impact in the ‘messy middle’ | The Drum, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.thedrum.com/news/2024/02/15/how-marketers-can-make-impact-the-messy-middle
  28. B2B Customer Journeys: How They’re Evolving in 2024 | Twilio …, accessed April 21, 2025, https://segment.com/growth-center/customer-journey/b2b/
  29. ABM vs. ABX: Understanding the Shift in B2B Marketing – UnboundB2B, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.unboundb2b.com/blog/abm-vs-abx-in-b2b-marketing/
  30. Selling to Buying Committees: How to win over buying teams – Dock.us, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.dock.us/library/buying-committees
  31. Research Reveals Most Influential Social Media in B2B Buying, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.socialmediatoday.com/content/research-reveals-most-influential-social-media-b2b-buying
  32. What Influences B2B Buying Behavior: Key Factors and Strategies – SalesIntel, accessed April 21, 2025, https://salesintel.io/blog/what-influences-b2b-buying-behavior/
  33. Mapping the B2B Buyer Journey: Strategies for Success in 2025 – Cognism, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.cognism.com/blog/ultimate-guide-to-the-b2b-buyers-journey
  34. Decoding the Psychology of B2B Buyers: Insights for Effective Lead Generation – iCumulus, accessed April 21, 2025, https://icumulus.ai/b2b/decoding-the-psychology-of-b2b-buyers-insights-for-effective-lead-generation/
  35. How to Best Use Social Media When Conducting B2B Market Research – Adience, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.adience.com/blog/how-to/how-to-best-use-social-media-when-conducting-b2b-market-research/
  36. Why B2B Buyers Trust UGC More Than Your Marketing—and How, accessed April 21, 2025, https://company.marketscale.com/post/why-b2b-buyers-trust-ugc-more-than-your-marketing-and-how-to-leverage-it
  37. Forrester: B2B Organizations Must Evolve To Encompass AI Agents And External Influencers To Align With How Modern Buyers Want To Buy, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.forrester.com/press-newsroom/forrester-b2b-summit-north-america-2025-new-research/
  38. B2B Buying Committee: Common Roles and Strategies for Getting Buy-In | Flowla, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.flowla.com/blog/b2b-buying-committee-roles-and-strategies-for-getting-buy-in
  39. 40 Sales Statistics from SalesForce Research 2023 – Sales Training Courses and Programs Online | Sales-Alliance.com, accessed April 21, 2025, https://sales-alliance.com/statistics/40-sales-statistics-salesforce-research-2023/
  40. The Future of Sales: Digital First Sales Transformation Strategies …, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.gartner.com/en/sales/trends/future-of-sales
  41. How Omnichannel Ecommerce Will Drive B2B Sales in 2025: Insights from McKinsey’s Latest Survey – Kensium, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.kensium.com/blog/how-omnichannel-ecommerce-will-drive-b2b-sales-in-2025-insights-from-mckinseys-latest-survey
  42. State of the Connected Customer – HBR Türkiye Webinar, accessed April 21, 2025, https://webinar.hbrturkiye.com/storage/uploads/state-of-the-connected-customer-655b114557dfa.pdf
  43. What’s the Future of B2B Sales? Trends for 2025 and Beyond – Cognism, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.cognism.com/blog/b2b-sales-trends
  44. B2B Marketing in 2025: Trends, Tools, and Timeless Strategies, accessed April 21, 2025, https://ballisticarts.com/the-state-of-b2b-marketing-in-2025-whats-changed/
  45. Unlocking profitable B2B growth through gen AI – McKinsey, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketing-and-sales/our-insights/unlocking-profitable-b2b-growth-through-gen-ai
  46. 51 Sales Statistics and Performance Benchmarks for 2025 – Vena Solutions, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.venasolutions.com/blog/sales-statistics
  47. Top 5 Sales Team Resolutions for 2025 – Vivun, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.vivun.com/blog/top-5-sales-team-resolutions-for-2025
  48. B2B Marketing Trends | Forrester Summit 2025 | Noble Studios, accessed April 21, 2025, https://noblestudios.com/industry/b2b-marketing/four-key-b2b-buyer-trends-forrester-summit/
  49. Best list of B2B stats – Gotoclient, accessed April 21, 2025, https://gotoclient.com/en/blog/https-gotoclient-com-en-blog-https-gotoclient-com-en-blog-most-relevant-statistics-that-everyone-involved-with-b2b-should-know-about/
  50. Key tactics for successful next-gen B2B sales | McKinsey, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketing-and-sales/our-insights/next-gen-b2b-sales-how-three-game-changers-grabbed-the-opportunity
  51. B2B Buying Committee Techniques to Influence Key Stakeholders – Demand Exchange, accessed April 21, 2025, https://demandexchange.com/b2b-buying-committee-techniques-influence-key-stakeholders/
  52. Rethinking The B2B Buyer’s Journey In The Age Of AI – Forbes, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesagencycouncil/2023/11/15/rethinking-the-b2b-buyers-journey-in-the-age-of-ai/
  53. Online B2B Industry Forums: Be Helpful for Better Lead Generation – Weidert Group, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.weidert.com/blog/b2b-industry-forums
  54. What Is “Day Trading Attention”? – Gary Vaynerchuk, accessed April 21, 2025, https://garyvaynerchuk.com/what-is-day-trading-attention/
  55. BOM – Day Trading Attention by Gary Vaynerchuck – Victor Menasce, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.victorjm.com/2024/06/introduction-the-power-of-attention-and-adaptation-in-business/
  56. Summary of Day Trading Attention, accessed April 21, 2025, https://bizbookshorts.com/summary-of-day-trading-attention/
  57. How to “day trade” attention: 5 key digital branding strategies – Big Think, accessed April 21, 2025, https://bigthink.com/business/how-to-day-trade-attention/
  58. Day Trading Attention Summary – YouTube, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upT-Ip2vzgg
  59. Notes from Gary Vee’s new book so far : r/SocialMediaMarketing – Reddit, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/SocialMediaMarketing/comments/1cygc7z/notes_from_gary_vees_new_book_so_far/
  60. Day Trading Attention by Gary Vaynerchuk: 14 Minute Summary – YouTube, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLtJ_vUonKQ
  61. Day Trading Attention by Gary Vaynerchuk Free Summary Audiobook – YouTube, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWwZKWYiLnM
  62. 2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot | PPT – SlideShare, accessed April 21, 2025, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/2024-state-of-marketing-report-by-hubspot/266319371